Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

About This Club

A club to discuss languages and language learning, for all languages, learners, teachers and linguists alike.

  1. What's new in this club
  2. Okay, so I refereed to a difficulty with government mandation, this is particularly noticeable if the requirement is extended to home schooling. The law of some country or region within it states that all children must have formal education and one subject they must do is at least one language other than their own. So if a given child is home schooled in that jurisdiction, which are they going to learn. Now if they go to a public school in that jurisdiction and that public school only teaches one of the officially licenced languages, that child learns which ever F.L (foreign language) subject is taught at that school. Or if setting up a school in that jurisdiction, it raises the question of which officially licenced foreign language(s) to teach there. But if instead the requirement is intercultural investigations and/or at least one foreign language, there isn't really the donkey's dilemma.
  3. Not a bad idea but those learning the languages should have some sort of involvement in that. Eg, would have been pointless me learning French at school but not really being taught anything about France and other French speaking countries. Not that I know much about Quebec though.
  4. How about intercultural investigations as an alternative? To understand better the difficulties I mentioned, read about donkey voting. If you know what that is, you'll understand that it comes from difficulties with compulsory voting, which also apply to compulsory teach of at least one foreign language during compulsory years of education.
  5. Also, @HalfFull in your case, and in the case of the school of @StarlessEclipse, there was a specific language other than English that everyone attending that school had to learn. Also, those not attending that particular school obviously didn't necessarily have to learn. What I am referring to is where a government requires all children in any school in a given jurisdiction to learn at least one officially licensed language. It forces at decision at every school there as to which of those languages to teach there. There is a difficulty with that approach. Furthermore, there are flaws even in the very reasoning behind the mandation. The very idea that a language other than English is a very important part of education has always surprised me, especially if it seen as no less important that other subjects taught in English. There is a big difference between learning another language and learning something else, like maths, science, history, or even art or music, in one's own language. Learning to speak, and even write, is a more fundamental skill than just about any other, such as singing and athletic ability.
  6. Well, one problem with such mandation is what it encourages foreign language teachers to do, and these practices were despised by Michel Thomas and are currently despised by Mihalis Eleftheriou, particularly pressure to get things right. While I would like to see a substantial portion of students learning some foreign language, particularly if their parents or some other relative use one at home, this doesn't take away difficulties with a government mandation of foreign language learning that applies to all schoolchildren. It is different if there is a specific reason for requiring all schoolchildren to learn a specific foreign language. Here, the difficulties mentioned above don't apply. As I said, they don't not apply to mandation of other subjects taught in one's own language. Well sort of, it doesn't apply to teaching of maths, unless all schoolchildren were required to learn at least one branch of maths but not any specific branch. It doesn't apply to a requirement to learn say, general history or the history of one's own country or area. But a requirement to learn the history of at least one other country would indeed be similar to mandation of foreign languages.
  7. In my school, learning French for 3 years was a condition of attending, and 5 years for pupils joining from 1987 onwards. However, in the UK if a school follows the National Curriculum as the vast majority do, then 5 years foreign language learning will be imposed on the school as part of the deal. There are or were some schools opting out of the National Curriculum, but chances are that fewer subjects were on offer, and tutors and the school were under more pressure to make their lessons work effectively. I think the National Curriculum helps provide a framework, though yes there may be some disadvantages. It will always be French, German, Spanish or Italian for the National Curriculum schools. The schools that opt out might not be required to offer a language but I'd need to research it to find out for sure. I agree that forcing non-interested pupils to learn a language isn't a great idea. I'd possibly be in agreement about not making it a compulsory subject from age 14, but I think that for 11 to 14 year olds its better to be a feature of the timetable. Maybe they could make a compromise though that those really not interested instead do extra Maths or Science, or should Art, Drama and Music be made optional from age 11 too? It should certainly be available as otherwise international trade will really suffer as it could end up one day that most of the world speaks English but hardly any English people speak a second language! Imagine that!
  8. @HalfFull Whether you thought it was a bad thing or not there are difficulties with government mandation of foreign languages. Are you referring to learning French being a condition for attending your school? As I said, this is different from a government mandation. Here are the difficulties: If someone is required to learn at least one foreign language at school, which language are they to learn? Government mandation means that schoolchildren are required to learn at least one officially licensed foreign language, whether or not they learn any other. If they attend a school in the public school system, they are required to learn one of the languages taught at that school, and usually this is one of the biggest Berlitz languages. In most English speaking countries, at least in the Northern Hemisphere this is most commonly French, German, Spanish or Italian. And then there are flaws in the reasoning given: Learning different foreign languages opens up different job opportunities, there is no job opportunity that can be opened up simply by learning at least one foreign language. But learning mathematics, even high school maths (geometry, algebra and analysis) opens up much more job opportunities, and it opens the same job opportunities to everyone who does well enough in maths. Learning a second language does not improve one's skills at communicating with other native speakers of one's own language and doesn't always makes one smarter. Learning the grammar and vocabulary of a another language reveals next to nothing about the culture that speaks it.
  9. I never thought it was a bad thing when French was made mandatory for Years 10 and 11 (ages 14-16) at the school I had left not long before. I was in one of the last years who only had to do it for 3 years and could then choose it as an option as I did. Needless to say that it increases the possibility of being able to communicate with a French customer in the workplace. In some schools, this could be German or Spanish. English is mandatory to age 16 or above in most Western European countries and many speak it fluently. I kind of feel like they should not be expected to make all the effort. At the same time making it optional for at least the final 2 years of High school might be the fairest way. Certainly its pointless making a subject requiring particular skills mandatory if the time could be put to better use using a different skill, but what we don't want is to rely entirely on the people we do trade with knowing English, as it may be a recipe for disaster.
  10. And this requires more dedication and enthusiasm than doing the same with subjects like reading, writing and numeracy skills, and even some academic subjects. Suppose there were a point system where students earn points from incidental use of the language in question and had to earn a certain number of points at a minimum to continue beyond the mandatory years. Note I am referring to the difficulties with government mandation. If a school requires all students to learn at least one foreign language, that's a different matter. In that case, learning a second language is a condition for attending the school and does not apply to students of other schools. If learning Latin were a condition for attending Catholic schools, parents who don't want their children mandated that they learn it against their will could just send their children to other schools. If learning Hebrew were a condition for attending Jewish schools, a similar thing would apply, don't send children to a Jewish school if you don't want them mandated to learning it against their will. That's the best I could do with responding to both the posts above.
  11. I agree that foreign language learning should not be manditory in schools. It should be optional. The only subjects which should be manditory are basic reading, writing and numeracy skills, because they will form the basis of whaterver else you choose to do in life. I enjoyed learning languages at school, but I know that not everyone does. I also agree that one cannot improve one's communication skills in one's mother tongue through learning a foreign language. The main goal and motivation of those learning a foreign language is to learn to communicate in that language, not to communicate better in their mother tongue. However, many of the teaching materials contain some valuable social communication scripts, essay writing skills and presentation skills which are transferable to a person's own culture and may help those who have communication difficulties, such as those with ASD. I personally benefit from many of the materials for business English, for example, and area of communication that I find particularly difficult, though I know that this is not relevant to manditory teaching in schools.
  12. I'm no linguistic expert, but I do have some relatively recent personal experience that I feel is relevant. French was by far my least favourite subject at school, not because of any predisposition against learning a language, but because mandating that everybody learn against their will something that requires so much dedication and enthusiasm is plainly a recipe for disaster. The combination of boredom and the inevitable lack of progress meant that disruptive behaviour got out of control in every single mandatory class. My teacher was a very nice woman who clearly loved her subject, but genuinely seemed to have become a shadow of her former self on the verge of a nervous breakdown by the end of the year because the situation was so dire. I remember absolutely no one who chose to carry on after the mandatory language years were over, because everyone was just so glad to be free of the abject misery that those classes always were. If the subject had stopped being mandatory after the first year and people didn't end up scarred by those bad experiences, there would undoubtedly have been many more enthusiasts willing to carry on. I have a qualification on paper, but I can honestly say I've retained nothing from those four years. The whole thing was a total shambolic disaster.
  13. Another reason given is that by learning a language we learn about culture. First of all, does that, if you think about it does it sound more like a reason to encourage, not mandate? And learn about which culture? As if, say, we learn about life in a hunter-gatherer society in an arid environment simply learning the Nama language of Namibia?
  14. Myrtonos

    Explaining Grammatical terms: verb

    Another difference between verbs and other words that can also have 'to' in front of them is that those other words can also have 'for' or 'towards' in front of them.
  15. In this very important thread, I'm going to address difficulties with mandatory teaching of foreign languages, these difficulties do not apply to mandating teaching of other subjects. I've never heard of these being acknowledged, but I have long noticed them. As far as I know, even those opposed to this mandation don't acknowledge them. First of all, if someone is required to learn at least one foreign language at school, which language are they to learn? Also, this in fact means that schoolchildren are required to learn at least one officially licensed foreign language, whether or not they learn any other. If they attend a school in the public school system, they are required to learn one of the languages taught at that school, and usually this is one of the biggest Berlitz languages, most often French, German, Spanish or Italian. Chinese and Japanese are also commonly taught. There are also serious flaws in the reasoning given in favour of requiring all schoolchildren to learn at least one foreign language. One reason given is job opportunities; Learning different foreign languages opens up different job opportunities, there is no job opportunity that can be opened up simply by learning at least one foreign language. The worst one is that learning a second language improves one's communication skills or makes one smarter. First of all, does learning another languages really improve one's skills at communicating to other native speakers of one's own language. Also, the belief that learning a second language makes you smarter assumes that we think in language, but if that were the case, than anything that can't be said couldn't be thought. Indeed the more words one learns in one's native language, the more thoughts one can transcribe. And when is the last time you have heard of someone learning another language just to get smarter or improve one's skills at communicating with native speakers of one's own language. If so, which language?
  16. HalfFull


    So Nesf and Riri both like to drink beer? Google Translate really does give away peoples secrets, or likes to have fun making things up
  17. Joie6


    No worries I think that it was a good idea to say these random positive things about the people on the forum. And you could be sure that in my case, there won't have any backfire
  18. Peridot


    How strange. I tried to write it very simply so that it could be easily understood. I actually put it in Google Translator and thought it translated it very well but I guess I saw that wrong. It just means that just like Nesf and Riri you also like music. I didn't write anything deep or anything, I just meant to say some random, positive things about the people on the forum. The idea being that it was easy to follow for those interested in picking up some basic Dutch. I'm sorry it ended up being confusing. I guess it kinda backfired.
  19. Joie6


    Sorry, after having translated this sentence in french then in english, I still don't understand what you mean.
  20. Peridot


    Asperclick is een forum waarop veel interessante, leuke en kleurrijke mensen te vinden zijn. Zo is er bijvoorbeeld Sirius die zijn nickname vaak eer aan doet. Een vrij ernstige jongeman. Maar dat is voor mij absoluut niet een bron van ergernis. Ik mag hem wel, die Sirius. Nesf is een vrouw uit Griekenland die van muziek en bier houdt. Riri is Amerikaans en houdt ook van bier en muziek. Net als Nesf en Riri houdt de Française Joie6 ook van muziek. Ze danst en eet bananen en citrusvruchten voor de energie. Willow is er ook. Een charismatische vrouw die fotografeert en schildert. Asgardian, een sympathieke jongen uit Engeland die bijvoorbeeld van motorsport en films over superhelden houdt. En zo kan ik nog wel even doorgaan over al die interessante mensen op Asperclick, een forum die ik graag bezoek.
  21. Joie6

    Ich Brauch Wasser

    Und du, @Nesf ?
  22. Joie6

    A Foreign word for each letter

    das werden (german) = the will
  23. Joie6


    Pas de soucis = Geen Probleem jij ook (Toi aussi)
  24. Verdad (Spanish) = Truth
  25. Peridot


    Sorry it took me so long to respond. Je suis vraiment désolé, Joie6! But I didn't see your question until just now. You're welcome would be "graag gedaan" I guess. It sort of translates to "I happily did it for you". More Dutch... Joie6 is een heel aardig iemand. <--- Joie6 est très sympa.
  26. Joie6


    How do you say "je t'en pris" (you're welcome) in dutch ?

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.